Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and MBB

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $26.9bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and $35.5bn for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.6 points; MBB is 1.3 times larger.

EMXC vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.04%
Net assets$26.9bn$35.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +33.8% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.04%
Holdings 696 10813
Net assets $26.9bn $35.5bn

EMXC and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMXC and MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.