Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and MBB

Net assets: $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, and $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.68 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.1 points; MBB is 1.2 times larger.

EEM vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.04%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$28.7bn$35.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 23, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,022 weekly returns
EEM MBB
Return
Total return edge EEM +137.3% +63.4%
Annualized edge EEM +4.5% +2.5%
Price return edge EEM +59.0% −9.6%
Risk
Volatility edge MBB 23.6% 4.2%
Max drawdown edge MBB −62.6% −17.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MBB (slight) 0.24 0.24
Sortino edge MBB (slight) 0.34 0.35
Calmar edge MBB 0.07 0.15
Reading

EEM returned more: +137.3% to +63.4%. MBB swung less: 4.2% to 23.6%. MBB fell less at its worst: −17.4% to −62.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EEM vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMMBBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+137.3%+63.4%EEMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.5%+2.5%EEMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+59.0%−9.6%EEMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.6%4.2%MBBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.5%2.9%MBBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−62.6%−17.4%MBBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.240.24MBB (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.340.35MBB (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.070.15MBBAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,022 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EEM MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EEM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.88%
SK HYNIX 4.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.64%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82%
MEDIATEK 1.54%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.94%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.91%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +16.3% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.04%
Holdings 1186 10813
Net assets, EEM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 $29.1bn $35.5bn

EEM and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-EAE73B758A

EEM and MBB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EEM follows MSCI Emerging Markets Index and MBB follows Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EEM returned +16.3% and MBB −0.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EEM and MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.68 percentage points a year. That is about $68 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.