Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to EWT's +69.9%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and EWT

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $26.9bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and $12.0bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.59%
EWT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EMXC costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.1 points; EMXC is 2.2 times larger.

EMXC vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCEWT
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+69.9%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 20267.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexMSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.59%
Net assets$26.9bn$12.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common36%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC EWT
Return
Total return edge EWT +122.9% +353.0%
Annualized edge EWT +9.1% +17.7%
Price return edge EWT +80.5% +182.7%
Risk
Volatility edge EMXC 19.2% 21.4%
Max drawdown edge EWT (slight) −40.7% −38.2%
Downside capture 97.9% 88.6%
Beta 0.97 0.82
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EWT 0.41 0.75
Sortino edge EWT 0.57 1.10
Treynor 0.098 0.155
Calmar edge EWT 0.22 0.46
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year +4.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 1.63
Information ratio −0.30 0.19
Tracking error 3.6% 13.9%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; EWT against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EWT returned more: +353.0% to +122.9%. EMXC swung less: 19.2% to 21.4%. EWT fell slightly less at its worst: −38.2% to −40.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCEWTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+353.0%EWTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+17.7%EWTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+182.7%EWTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%21.4%EMXCSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%14.6%EMXC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−38.2%EWT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%78.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%88.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.970.82Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.67Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.75EWTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.571.10EWTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.155Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.46EWTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXEEMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year+4.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.591.63Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−0.9% to +9.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%13.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

36%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and EWT hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

36% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91% 22.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92% 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02% 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99% 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 0.73% 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 0.48% 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 0.48% 2.04%
UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 0.47% 1.84%
ELITE MATERIAL 0.46% 1.88%
FUBON FINANCIAL HOLDING 0.46% 1.87%
CTBC FINANCIAL HOLDING 0.42% 1.70%
CATHAY FINANCIAL HOLDING 0.37% 1.39%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
ICICI BANK 0.84%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD 0.79%
BHARTI AIRTEL LTD 0.64%
SK SQUARE 0.63%
Only in EWT
FTSE TAIWAN NOV 26 0.00%
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE 0.00%
YA HSIN INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks the MSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +69.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX +53.6 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 696 79
Net assets $26.9bn $12.0bn

EMXC and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6ADFBF7BF2

EMXC and EWT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and EWT +69.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 36.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC and EWT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or EWT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and EWT +69.9%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or EWT?
EMXC is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against EWT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-ewt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.