Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs EWT: how they differ
EEM and EWT hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and EWT hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EEM | EWT |
|---|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING | 15.18% | 22.07% |
| MEDIATEK | 1.71% | 7.03% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS | 0.82% | 3.53% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY | 0.77% | 3.28% |
| ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING | 0.55% | 2.79% |
| UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP | 0.41% | 2.09% |
| ELITE MATERIAL | 0.39% | 2.08% |
| UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 0.34% | 1.87% |
| FUBON FINANCIAL HOLDING | 0.31% | 1.68% |
| NAN YA PLASTICS CORP | 0.29% | 2.04% |
| ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS | 0.28% | 1.86% |
| CTBC FINANCIAL HOLDING | 0.28% | 1.49% |
| Only in EEM | Only in EWT |
|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 7.46% | USD CASH 0.13% |
| SK HYNIX 6.07% | CASH COLLATERAL USD BZUFT 0.02% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.65% | |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82% | |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.97% | |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83% | |
| HDFC BANK 0.66% | |
| SK SQUARE 0.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Emerging markets | MSCI Taiwan |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +84.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | +67.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 965 | 78 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 965 positions, with the top ten at 38.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or EWT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or EWT?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so EWT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against EWT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-ewt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources