Which returned more over the last year, EMB or TLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and TLT returned −6.4%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or TLT?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs TLT: how they differ

EMB and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMB returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in TLT
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	TREASURY BOND 0.02%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.15%
Holdings	612	41

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or TLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and TLT returned −6.4%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or TLT?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources