Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or IUSB?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs IUSB: how they differ

EMB and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMB returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in IUSB
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	United States of America 0.38%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	United States of America 0.37%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	United States of America 0.37%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	United States of America 0.37%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	United States of America 0.36%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	United States of America 0.36%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	United States of America 0.36%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.06%
Holdings	612	17819

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or IUSB?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against IUSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-iusb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources