Which returned more over the last year, EMB or QQQM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or QQQM?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs QQQM: how they differ

EMB and QQQM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in QQQM
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	NVIDIA Corp 8.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	Apple Inc 7.72%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	Microsoft Corp 5.89%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	Micron Technology Inc 4.90%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	Amazon.com Inc 4.36%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	Alphabet Inc 3.12%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	Meta Platforms Inc 3.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+5.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.15%
Holdings	612	106

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or QQQM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or QQQM?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against QQQM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against QQQM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-qqqm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources