Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMB vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMB and PDBC

Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.39%
EMB expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EMB costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 56.0 points; EMB is 1.7 times larger.

EMB vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$13.2bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMB PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMB
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.08%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.76%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.65%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.64%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.56%
URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.54%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.59%
Holdings 622 1
Net assets, EMB as of Oct 28, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $13.2bn $8.0bn

EMB and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMB and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, EMB or PDBC?
EMB is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMB against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.