Which returned more over the last year, EMB or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or LQD?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs LQD: how they differ

EMB and LQD hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and EMB returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and LQD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EMB and LQD both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	EMB	LQD
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY	0.84%	0.88%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in LQD
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%
PANAMA (REPUBLIC OF) 0.25%	MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK NA 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.14%
Holdings	612	3149

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or LQD?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources