Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMB vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to IVV's +13.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMB and IVV

Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
0.39%
EMB expense ratio
0.03%
IVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $13.2bn.

EMB vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBIVV
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core IndexS&P 500
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.03%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$13.2bn$885.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 28, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 982 weekly returns
EMB IVV
Return
Total return edge IVV +126.2% +631.7%
Annualized edge IVV +4.4% +11.1%
Price return edge IVV −9.4% +417.1%
Risk
Volatility edge EMB 11.3% 18.0%
Max drawdown edge EMB −32.0% −52.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IVV 0.31 0.60
Sortino edge IVV 0.42 0.85
Calmar edge IVV 0.14 0.21
Reading

IVV returned more: +631.7% to +126.2%. EMB swung less: 11.3% to 18.0%. EMB fell less at its worst: −32.0% to −52.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMB vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBIVVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+126.2%+631.7%IVVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.4%+11.1%IVVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−9.4%+417.1%IVVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.3%18.0%EMBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.4%12.7%EMBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.0%−52.2%EMBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.60IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.420.85IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.140.21IVVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 982 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and IVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMB IVV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMB
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.08%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.76%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.65%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.64%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.56%
URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.54%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52%
Only in IVV
NVIDIA 7.92%
APPLE 7.61%
MICROSOFT 5.93%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83%
BROADCOM INC 2.45%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.1 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.03%
Holdings 622 505
Net assets, EMB as of Oct 28, 2026 and IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 $13.2bn $885.1bn

EMB and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5A0685D7FC

EMB and IVV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMB follows J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index and IVV follows S&P 500.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMB returned −0.4% and IVV +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMB and IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IVV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and IVV +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, EMB or IVV?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMB against IVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-ivv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.