Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EFA vs IJH: how they differ
EFA and IJH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EFA and IJH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EFA | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA | 0.52% | 0.29% |
| CSL | 0.27% | 0.38% |
| ANGLO AMERICAN PLC | 0.26% | 0.24% |
| ALLIANZ | 0.88% | 0.24% |
| ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI | 0.17% | 0.15% |
| ORANGE SA | 0.15% | 0.17% |
| NEXT PLC | 0.10% | 0.34% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.03% | 0.16% |
| DASSAULT AVIATION SA | 0.02% | 0.21% |
| Only in EFA | Only in IJH |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING 3.01% | TWILIO CLASS A 1.00% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61% | ILLUMINA INC 0.87% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36% | TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86% |
| SHELL PLC 1.25% | EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15% | OKTA CLASS A 0.82% |
| NOVARTIS AG 1.15% | ATI 0.78% |
| NESTLE SA 1.12% | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09% | TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Developed markets ex US | S&P MidCap 400 |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.2% | +13.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.7 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 670 | 405 |
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EFA or IJH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and IJH returned +13.4%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EFA or IJH?
- EFA charges 0.32% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EFA and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against IJH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-ijh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources