Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEFA vs IJH: how they differ

IEFA and IJH hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IEFA returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and IJH hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IEFA and IJH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIEFAIJH
COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA0.45%0.29%
ALLIANZ0.76%0.24%
CSL0.23%0.38%
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC0.22%0.24%
ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI0.15%0.15%
CAR GROUP0.03%0.06%
NEXTDC0.03%0.34%
ORICA0.03%0.26%
USD CASH0.03%0.05%
DASSAULT AVIATION SA0.02%0.21%
PERSIMMON PLC0.02%0.07%
4IMPRINT GROUP PLC0.01%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEFAOnly in IJH
ASML HOLDING 2.62%TWILIO CLASS A 1.00%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.40%ILLUMINA INC 0.87%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.18%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86%
SHELL PLC 1.09%EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.00%OKTA CLASS A 0.82%
NOVARTIS AG 0.99%ATI 0.78%
NESTLE SA 0.97%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.94%TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IEFA and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI EAFES&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts−4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%0.0%
Holdings1650405

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1650 positions, with the top ten at 12.0%.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or IJH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and IJH returned +13.4%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or IJH?
IEFA charges 0.07% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEFA against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against IJH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-ijh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources