Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs FENI: how they differ

EFA and FENI hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Fidelity Enhanced International ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and FENI hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EFA and FENI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEFAFENI
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD0.56%0.22%
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LTD0.18%0.31%
RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP0.17%0.30%
DISCO CORP0.14%0.21%
BOC HONG KONG HOLDINGS LTD0.11%0.35%
SUN HUNG KAI PROPERTIES LTD0.09%0.16%
BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS INC0.08%0.36%
DAIWA SECURITIES GROUP INC0.07%0.47%
CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD0.05%0.12%
GEA GROUP AG0.05%0.04%
SYMRISE AG0.06%0.04%
MINEBEA MITSUMI INC0.03%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EFAOnly in FENI
ASML HOLDING 3.01%ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61%NESTLE SA 1.77%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%SIEMENS AG 1.63%
SHELL PLC 1.25%TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15%ABB LTD 1.34%
NOVARTIS AG 1.15%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.33%
NESTLE SA 1.12%IBERDROLA SA 1.23%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09%BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EFA and FENI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isDeveloped markets ex USEnhanced International
Total return, 1 year+18.2%+19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.7 pts+1.9 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.28%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings670392

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or FENI?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and FENI returned +19.4%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or FENI?
EFA charges 0.32% a year and FENI charges 0.28%, so FENI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFA and FENI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 0% of FENI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against FENI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against FENI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-feni Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources