Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and NOBL

Net assets: $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

NOBL costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; EEM is 2.5 times larger.

EEM vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMNOBL
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+15.5%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$29.1bn$11.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EEM NOBL
BUDIMEX SA 0.02% 1.78%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EEM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.88%
SK HYNIX 4.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.64%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82%
MEDIATEK 1.54%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.94%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.91%
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.63%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +15.5%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 98.3%
Holdings 1186 69
Net assets, EEM as of Oct 27, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 $29.1bn $11.6bn

EEM and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EEM and NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or NOBL?
NOBL is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EEM and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.