Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IEMG vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEMG returned +15.3% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IEMG and NOBLNet assets: $150.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
IEMG costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; IEMG is 12.9 times larger.
| Measure | IEMG | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.3% | +15.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI) | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $150.4bn | $11.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.7% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IEMG and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEMG
IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +15.3% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IEMG or NOBL?
- IEMG is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IEMG against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IEMG against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-nobl
[IEMG against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.