Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to MUB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and MUB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $29.1bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and $54.1bn for iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.05%
MUB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.67 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.7 points; MUB is 1.9 times larger.

EEM vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMMUB
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%−0.4%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$29.1bn$54.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EEM MUB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EEM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.88%
SK HYNIX 4.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.64%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82%
MEDIATEK 1.54%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.94%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.91%
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Tracks an index of National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year +16.3% −0.4%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.05%
Holdings 1186 7873
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $29.1bn $54.1bn

EEM and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EEM and MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or MUB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and MUB −0.4%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or MUB?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.67 percentage points a year. That is about $67 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against MUB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-mub

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.