Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DYNF vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DYNF returned +14.5% to VGT's +24.7%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYNF and VGT

Net assets: $42.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+14.5%
DYNF total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.2 points; VGT is 3.7 times larger.

DYNF vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.5%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.26%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$41.8bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common39%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund40.7%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 395 weekly returns
DYNF VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +202.7% +403.3%
Annualized edge VGT +15.7% +23.7%
Price return edge VGT +170.1% +375.2%
Risk
Volatility edge DYNF 19.3% 24.3%
Max drawdown edge DYNF (slight) −32.7% −34.1%
Downside capture 102.2% 99.9%
Beta 1.03 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.71 0.88
Sortino edge VGT 1.02 1.35
Treynor 0.132 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.48 0.70
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.05 0.80
Information ratio 0.09 0.19
Tracking error 3.9% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: DYNF against PBUS, Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +403.3% to +202.7%. DYNF swung less: 19.3% to 24.3%. DYNF fell slightly less at its worst: −32.7% to −34.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DYNF vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+202.7%+403.3%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.7%+23.7%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+170.1%+375.2%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.3%24.3%DYNFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.4%15.9%DYNFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.7%−34.1%DYNF (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture104.8%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture102.2%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.031.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.961.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.88VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.021.35VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1320.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.480.70VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.050.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.9% to +2.7%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.090.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.9%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 395 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

39%

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VGT hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

39% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYNF VGT
NVIDIA 8.15% 17.58%
APPLE 8.14% 15.91%
MICROSOFT 4.76% 11.16%
BROADCOM INC 2.46% 4.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.74% 4.45%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.67% 3.67%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.61% 1.60%
LAM RESEARCH 1.24% 1.55%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.05% 1.53%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.76% 1.55%
SALESFORCE 1.62% 0.72%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.67% 0.80%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DYNF
AMAZON.COM INC 4.12%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.30%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.99%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.34%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.31%
BANK OF AMERICA 2.10%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.96%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.90%
Only in VGT
KLA Corp 0.98%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 0.38%
Synopsys Inc 0.33%
Motorola Solutions Inc 0.31%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.27%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.26%
Everpure Inc 0.20%
NetApp Inc 0.20%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +14.5% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +1.2 pts vs PBUS −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 94.8% 86.8%
Holdings 262 320
Net assets, DYNF as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $42.7bn $154.5bn

DYNF and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E0A2A97D3C

DYNF and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. DYNF follows No index, actively managed and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 39% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DYNF returned +14.5% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

DYNF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +14.5% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DYNF and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYNF against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.