Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs IGM: how they differ
DYNF and IGM hold 47% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IGM hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | IGM |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | 8.13% | 8.89% |
| APPLE | 7.62% | 9.14% |
| MICROSOFT | 4.75% | 10.11% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.59% | 7.42% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 2.42% | 4.87% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A | 2.39% | 4.23% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C | 1.98% | 3.39% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY | 1.83% | 4.73% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.54% | 1.89% |
| LAM RESEARCH | 1.53% | 1.66% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 1.50% | 3.66% |
| APPLIED MATERIAL INC | 1.20% | 1.61% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in IGM |
|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.09% | KLA 1.03% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46% | SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING CLASS A 0.69% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73% | CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS 0.35% |
| BANK OF AMERICA 2.17% | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 0.34% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.03% | SYNOPSYS 0.34% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 1.65% | TE CONNECTIVITY PLC 0.27% |
| TESLA INC 1.52% | NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.26% |
| CHEVRON 1.51% | CELESTICA 0.18% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Expanded Tech Sector |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +32.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +15.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.37% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 92.0% |
| Holdings | 234 | 272 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 272 positions, with the top ten at 58.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IGM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or IGM?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 47% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IGM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-igm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources