Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DYNF vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DYNF returned +14.5% to SCHG's +6.8%; 49% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYNF and SCHG

Net assets: $42.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+14.5%
DYNF total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points.

DYNF vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.5%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.26%0.04%
Net assets, DYNF as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$42.7bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common49%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund40.7%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 395 weekly returns
DYNF SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +202.7% +265.1%
Annualized edge SCHG +15.7% +18.6%
Price return edge SCHG +170.1% +250.7%
Risk
Volatility edge DYNF 19.3% 21.9%
Max drawdown edge DYNF (slight) −32.7% −34.2%
Downside capture 102.2% 108.1%
Beta 1.03 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG (slight) 0.71 0.76
Sortino edge SCHG 1.02 1.15
Treynor 0.132 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.48 0.54
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.05 0.65
Information ratio 0.09 0.40
Tracking error 3.9% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: DYNF against PBUS, Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +265.1% to +202.7%. DYNF swung less: 19.3% to 21.9%. DYNF fell slightly less at its worst: −32.7% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DYNF vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+202.7%+265.1%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.7%+18.6%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+170.1%+250.7%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.3%21.9%DYNFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.4%14.5%DYNF (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.7%−34.2%DYNF (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture104.8%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture102.2%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.031.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.76SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.021.15SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1320.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.480.54SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.050.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.9% to +2.7%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.090.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.9%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 395 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

49%

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SCHG hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

49% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYNF SCHG
NVIDIA 8.15% 10.67%
APPLE 8.14% 9.29%
MICROSOFT 4.76% 7.52%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.12% 5.07%
BROADCOM INC 2.46% 3.50%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.34% 2.51%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.31% 3.97%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.90% 3.16%
TESLA INC 1.71% 2.37%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.67% 2.37%
ELI LILLY 1.34% 2.93%
SALESFORCE 1.62% 0.81%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DYNF
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.30%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.99%
BANK OF AMERICA 2.10%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.96%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.74%
CHEVRON 1.62%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.61%
TRAVELERS COMPANIES 1.57%
Only in SCHG
General Electric Co 1.35%
KLA Corp 0.88%
Linde PLC 0.87%
Blackrock Inc 0.64%
S&P Global Inc 0.51%
Equinix Inc 0.40%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 0.36%
Constellation Energy Corp 0.34%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +14.5% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +1.2 pts vs PBUS −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 94.8% 94.7%
Holdings 262 192
Net assets, DYNF as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $42.7bn $63.0bn

DYNF and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0B07DE9DA6

DYNF and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. DYNF follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 49% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DYNF returned +14.5% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

DYNF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +14.5% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DYNF and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYNF against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.