Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs QUAL: how they differ

DYNF and QUAL hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and QUAL hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFQUAL
APPLE7.62%7.10%
NVIDIA8.13%6.44%
MICROSOFT4.75%7.67%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A2.42%4.32%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP2.73%2.35%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.03%2.17%
ALPHABET CLASS A2.39%1.94%
ALPHABET CLASS C1.98%1.53%
LAM RESEARCH1.53%3.59%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC1.20%2.81%
ELI LILLY1.17%3.62%
WALMART INC0.97%0.95%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in QUAL
AMAZON.COM INC 4.09%KLA 2.42%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46%AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC 1.20%
BROADCOM INC 2.59%LINDE PLC 0.99%
BANK OF AMERICA 2.17%CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL 0.97%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.83%3M 0.86%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.65%GARMIN 0.85%
SALESFORCE 1.62%ILLINOIS TOOL INC 0.72%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.54%WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 0.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DYNF and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%98.9%
Holdings234121

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 44.4%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or QUAL?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so QUAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against QUAL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-qual Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources