Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs PFF: how they differ
DYNF and PFF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and PFF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | PFF |
|---|---|---|
| ALPHABET CLASS A | 2.39% | 2.24% |
| AT&T | 0.75% | 0.41% |
| CITIGROUP | 1.19% | 0.37% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 3.46% | 0.32% |
| ORACLE | 0.31% | 2.31% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY | 0.48% | 0.26% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORP | 0.97% | 0.21% |
| CHARLES SCHWAB | 0.21% | 0.19% |
| HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP | 0.67% | 0.16% |
| MORGAN STANLEY | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| STATE STREET | 0.14% | 0.19% |
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP | 0.13% | 0.24% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in PFF |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 8.13% | BOEING CO 3.54% |
| APPLE 7.62% | SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC 2.30% |
| MICROSOFT 4.75% | MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED 0.89% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.09% | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES UNITS 0.74% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73% | NEXTERA ENERGY UNITS 0.70% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.59% | ARES MANAGEMENT CORP 0.61% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42% | BRUKER CORPORATION 0.53% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.03% | PPL CORPORATION 0.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Preferred and Income Securities |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | −0.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −18.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.45% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 21.6% |
| Holdings | 234 | 461 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.
PFF in plain words
PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or PFF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and PFF returned −0.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or PFF?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and PFF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 22% of PFF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against PFF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-pff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources