Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs PFF: how they differ

IVV and PFF hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and PFF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and PFF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVPFF
ALPHABET CLASS A2.98%2.24%
ORACLE0.40%2.31%
CITIGROUP0.36%0.37%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.45%0.32%
WELLS FARGO0.42%0.28%
AT&T0.27%0.41%
NEXTERA ENERGY0.26%0.26%
BOEING0.25%3.54%
CHARLES SCHWAB0.27%0.19%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.18%0.61%
MORGAN STANLEY0.39%0.18%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP0.17%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in PFF
NVIDIA 8.06%BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES UNITS 0.74%
APPLE 7.31%NEXTERA ENERGY UNITS 0.70%
MICROSOFT 5.58%BRUKER CORPORATION 0.53%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.76%STRIVE INC 0.38%
BROADCOM INC 2.61%NOVANTA TANGIBLE EQUITY UNITS 0.37%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.38%STRATEGY INC 0.37%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.16%REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INCOR 0.35%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.68%AEGON FUNDING CORPORATION II 0.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IVV and PFF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P 500Preferred and Income Securities
Total return, 1 year+17.6%−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−18.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.45%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%21.6%
Holdings505461

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

PFF in plain words

PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or PFF?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and PFF returned −0.8%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or PFF?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and PFF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 22% of PFF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against PFF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against PFF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-pff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources