Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs MOAT: how they differ
DYNF and MOAT hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and MOAT hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| MICROSOFT | 4.75% | 2.79% |
| NVIDIA | 8.13% | 2.58% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.59% | 2.23% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.09% | 1.36% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 2.42% | 1.29% |
| APPLIED MATERIAL INC | 1.20% | 1.41% |
| AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A | 0.69% | 1.31% |
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC | 0.56% | 1.36% |
| PALO ALTO NETWORKS | 0.22% | 2.40% |
| CHARLES SCHWAB | 0.21% | 2.75% |
| US BANCORP | 0.21% | 1.38% |
| WALT DISNEY | 0.12% | 1.25% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in MOAT |
|---|---|
| APPLE 7.62% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.41% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46% | Lpl Financial Holdings Inc 2.73% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73% | Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The 2.52% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.39% | Mondelez International Inc 2.43% |
| BANK OF AMERICA 2.17% | Brown-Forman Corp 2.39% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.03% | Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc 2.38% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 1.98% | Tyler Technologies Inc 2.37% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.83% | Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Morningstar Wide Moat |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +11.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −6.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.46% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 91.6% |
| Holdings | 234 | 55 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 27.1%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or MOAT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or MOAT?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against MOAT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-moat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources