Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DYNF vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DYNF returned +14.5% to MOAT's +10.3%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYNF and MOAT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $42.7bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

At a glance
+14.5%
DYNF total return, 1 year
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DYNF costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points; DYNF is 3.7 times larger.

DYNF vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFMOAT
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.5%+10.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMorningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.26%0.46%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$42.7bn$11.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common15%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund40.7%26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 395 weekly returns
DYNF MOAT
Return
Total return edge DYNF +202.7% +161.9%
Annualized edge DYNF +15.7% +13.5%
Price return edge DYNF +170.1% +140.2%
Risk
Volatility edge DYNF (slight) 19.3% 19.7%
Max drawdown edge MOAT (slight) −32.7% −30.8%
Downside capture 102.2% 100.0%
Beta 1.03 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DYNF 0.71 0.60
Sortino edge DYNF 1.02 0.88
Treynor 0.132 0.130
Calmar edge DYNF (slight) 0.48 0.44
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.05 −0.06
Information ratio 0.09 −0.05
Tracking error 3.9% 7.6%

Each against its own benchmark: DYNF against PBUS, Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; MOAT against VOO, May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

DYNF returned more: +202.7% to +161.9%. DYNF swung slightly less: 19.3% to 19.7%. MOAT fell slightly less at its worst: −30.8% to −32.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DYNF vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFMOATEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+202.7%+161.9%DYNFPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.7%+13.5%DYNFTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+170.1%+140.2%DYNFPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.3%19.7%DYNF (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.4%13.4%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.7%−30.8%MOAT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture104.8%98.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture102.2%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.030.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.81Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.60DYNFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.020.88DYNFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1320.130Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.480.44DYNF (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.05−0.06Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.9% to +2.7%−4.0% to +3.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.09−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.9%7.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 395 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

15%

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and MOAT hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

15% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYNF MOAT
MICROSOFT 4.76% 2.81%
NVIDIA 8.15% 2.38%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.34% 2.48%
BROADCOM INC 2.46% 2.19%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.12% 1.21%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.31% 1.18%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.05% 1.08%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.67% 1.26%
LOCKHEED MARTIN 0.22% 1.47%
CHARLES SCHWAB 0.17% 2.19%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.12% 1.48%
WALT DISNEY 0.12% 1.29%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DYNF
APPLE 8.14%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.30%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.99%
BANK OF AMERICA 2.10%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.96%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.90%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.74%
TESLA INC 1.71%
Only in MOAT
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Otis Worldwide Corp 2.53%
Zoetis Inc 2.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year +14.5% +10.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +1.2 pts vs PBUS −3.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.46%
Already in the S&P 500 94.8% 91.6%
Holdings 262 54
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $42.7bn $11.6bn

DYNF and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BB4809FF40

DYNF and MOAT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. DYNF follows No index, actively managed and MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DYNF returned +14.5% and MOAT +10.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

DYNF and MOAT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.

MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or MOAT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +14.5% and MOAT +10.3%.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or MOAT?
DYNF is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DYNF and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYNF against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-moat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.