Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs IXUS: how they differ

DYNF and IXUS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IXUS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFIXUS
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP0.10%0.14%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%0.09%
ALLSTATE CORP1.11%0.05%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND0.07%0.03%
APA0.02%0.02%
MERCK & CO INC0.02%0.04%
MILLICOM INTERNATIONAL CELLULAR0.06%0.02%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC0.03%0.02%
AT&T0.75%0.01%
NEWMONT0.71%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in IXUS
NVIDIA 8.13%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%
APPLE 7.62%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%
MICROSOFT 4.75%SK HYNIX 1.79%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.09%ASML HOLDING 1.55%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73%TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%
BROADCOM INC 2.59%ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.70%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DYNF and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveCore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%0.0%
Holdings2342540

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IXUS?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources