Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IXUS vs QUAL: how they differ

IXUS and QUAL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and QUAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IXUS and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIXUSQUAL
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.09%0.10%
MERCK0.04%1.40%
BALFOUR BEATTY PLC0.02%0.36%
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD0.02%0.10%
AEROPORTS DE PARIS SA0.01%1.20%
AMP LTD0.01%0.24%
CASH COLLATERAL USD SGAFT0.01%0.01%
EURAZEO0.01%0.08%
EXTENDICARE0.01%0.08%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IXUSOnly in QUAL
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%MICROSOFT 7.67%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%APPLE 7.10%
SK HYNIX 1.79%NVIDIA 6.44%
ASML HOLDING 1.55%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.32%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84%ELI LILLY 3.62%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%LAM RESEARCH 3.59%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.70%TJX 3.23%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%VISA CLASS A 3.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IXUS and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI Total International StockMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%98.9%
Holdings2540121

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 44.4%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IXUS or QUAL?
IXUS charges 0.07% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXUS and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IXUS against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against QUAL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixus-vs-qual Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources