Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DYNF vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DYNF returned +14.5% to FNDX's +23.9%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DYNF and FNDX
Net assets: $42.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points.
| Measure | DYNF | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +23.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Fundamental U.S. Large Company |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, DYNF as of Oct 27, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 | $42.7bn | $27.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 40.7% | 21.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and FNDX hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
45% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DYNF and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF and FNDX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. DYNF follows No index, actively managed and FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company.
- Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DYNF returned +14.5% and FNDX +23.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DYNF
DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or FNDX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +14.5% and FNDX +23.9%.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or FNDX?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DYNF against FNDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fndx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DYNF against FNDX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fndx
[DYNF against FNDX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fndx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.