Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DGRO vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DGRO returned +18.8% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DGRO and PDBC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $44.6bn for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+18.8%
DGRO total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.08%
DGRO expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DGRO costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.8 points; DGRO is 5.6 times larger.

DGRO vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDGROPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.8%+55.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar US Dividend Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$44.6bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DGRO PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DGRO
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.24%
MICROSOFT 3.14%
APPLE 3.11%
ABBVIE 3.00%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.77%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.68%
BROADCOM INC 2.55%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.42%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Dividend Growth Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.8% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.59%
Holdings 393 1
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $44.6bn $8.0bn

DGRO and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

DGRO and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DGRO

DGRO tracks an index of Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +18.8% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or PDBC?
DGRO is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DGRO against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.