Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IJT: how they differ

DGRO and IJT hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IJT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IJT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIJT
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%0.76%
INSTALLED BUILDING PRODUCTS0.04%0.54%
RADIAN GROUP0.03%0.28%
KONTOOR BRANDS0.02%0.21%
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS0.02%0.34%
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES INC0.02%0.25%
STEPSTONE GROUP CLASS A0.02%0.42%
VICTORY CAPITAL HOLDINGS CLASS A0.02%0.39%
USD CASH0.18%0.02%
ACUSHNET HOLDINGS CORP0.01%0.28%
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES0.01%0.82%
ASSURED GUARANTY LTD0.01%0.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IJT
MICROSOFT 3.45%CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20%VIASAT INC 1.19%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20%BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07%PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03%
APPLE 3.04%FORMFACTOR INC 1.03%
ABBVIE 3.02%RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98%
BROADCOM INC 2.38%ALKERMES 0.91%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16%STONEX GROUP INC 0.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DGRO and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings387355

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IJT?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IJT?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IJT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IJT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-ijt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources