Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IJR: how they differ

DGRO and IJR hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IJR hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IJR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIJR
USD CASH0.18%0.08%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%1.94%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS0.05%0.37%
INSTALLED BUILDING PRODUCTS0.04%0.26%
POOL0.04%0.32%
MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A0.03%0.36%
RADIAN GROUP0.03%0.21%
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES0.02%0.25%
KONTOOR BRANDS0.02%0.19%
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS0.02%0.32%
MDU RESOURCES GROUP0.02%0.23%
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES INC0.02%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IJR
MICROSOFT 3.45%CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 0.62%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20%VIASAT INC 0.57%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20%GLAUKOS 0.57%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07%MATCH GROUP INC 0.56%
APPLE 3.04%BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.52%
ABBVIE 3.02%QORVO 0.51%
BROADCOM INC 2.38%PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.51%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16%PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DGRO and IJR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P SmallCap 600
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+19.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+2.4 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings387608

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 6.8%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IJR?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IJR returned +19.9%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IJR?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IJR charges 0.06%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IJR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IJR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IJR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IJR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-ijr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources