Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IJS: how they differ

DGRO and IJS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IJS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IJS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIJS
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%1.68%
USD CASH0.18%0.05%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS0.05%0.72%
POOL0.04%0.62%
MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A0.03%0.70%
RADIAN GROUP0.03%0.27%
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES0.02%0.48%
KONTOOR BRANDS0.02%0.17%
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS0.02%0.28%
MDU RESOURCES GROUP0.02%0.44%
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES INC0.02%0.23%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS INC0.02%0.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IJS
MICROSOFT 3.45%MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20%PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.99%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20%SM ENERGY 0.96%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07%CARMAX INC 0.95%
APPLE 3.04%EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.86%
ABBVIE 3.02%JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.81%
BROADCOM INC 2.38%LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP 0.79%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16%CONAGRA BRANDS 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DGRO and IJS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P Small-Cap 600 Value
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+22.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings387466

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 466 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IJS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IJS returned +22.1%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IJS?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IJS charges 0.18%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IJS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IJS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-ijs Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources