Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DFUV vs EQWL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFUV returned +27.8% to EQWL's +15.1%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DFUV and EQWL
Net assets: $15.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF, and $2.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF.
Pair scorecard
DFUV costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.7 points.
| Measure | DFUV | EQWL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +27.8% | +15.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 100 Equal Weight Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, DFUV as of Jul 31, 2026 and EQWL as of Oct 27, 2026 | $15.4bn | $2.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.9% | 11.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
May 20, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 231 weekly returnsEQWL returned more: +94.1% to +82.0%. EQWL swung slightly less: 14.7% to 15.6%. DFUV and EQWL fell about the same at their worst: −16.0% and −16.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DFUV | EQWL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +82.0% | +94.1% | EQWL | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +14.4% | +16.1% | EQWL | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +68.6% | +77.9% | EQWL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.6% | 14.7% | EQWL (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.0% | 9.9% | EQWL (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −16.0% | −16.0% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.79 | EQWL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.94 | 1.18 | EQWL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.90 | 1.01 | EQWL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 231 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DFUV and EQWL hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DFUV and EQWL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUV and EQWL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. DFUV follows No index, actively managed and EQWL follows S&P 100 Equal Weight Index.
- Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DFUV returned +27.8% and EQWL +15.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
DFUV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,332 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
EQWL
EQWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 11.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUV or EQWL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUV returned +27.8% and EQWL +15.1%.
- Which is cheaper, DFUV or EQWL?
- DFUV is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFUV against EQWL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-eqwl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DFUV against EQWL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-eqwl
[DFUV against EQWL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-eqwl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.