DFLV vs DGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees

DFLV and DGRO hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and DFLV returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets: $6.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF, and $43.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF.

DGRO costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.6 points; DGRO is 6.3 times larger.

DFLV vs DGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
DFLVDGRO
Expense ratio0.21%0.08%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$6.8bn$42.8bn
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+15.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMorningstar US Dividend Growth Index
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%27.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+26.4%
DFLV total return, 1 year
+15.8%
DGRO total return, 1 year
0.21%
DFLV expense ratio
0.08%
DGRO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFLV and DGRO hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

34% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DFLV DGRO
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 3.57% 3.15%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.79% 2.75%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.38% 2.79%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.54% 1.81%
MERCK & CO., INC. 1.31% 1.85%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 1.26% 2.38%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.15% 1.63%
MORGAN STANLEY 1.14% 1.09%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 1.06% 1.28%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 1.08% 1.03%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.87% 0.92%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.85% 1.43%
Only in DFLV
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.00%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.30%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 1.87%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.81%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.14%
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 1.09%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION 0.94%
AT&T INC. 0.90%
Only in DGRO
MICROSOFT 3.27%
APPLE 3.11%
ABBVIE 2.99%
BROADCOM INC 2.79%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 2.29%
HOME DEPOT 1.91%
COCA-COLA 1.88%
PEPSICO 1.68%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year +26.4% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) not published
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs IWD not available
Expense ratio 0.21% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 93.8% 91.8%
Holdings 334 393
Net assets, DFLV as of Jul 31, 2026 and DGRO as of Oct 9, 2026 $6.8bn $43.1bn

DFLV and DGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DFLV

DFLV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 334 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About DGRO

DGRO tracks an index of Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 27.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFLV or DGRO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFLV returned +26.4% and DGRO +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, DFLV or DGRO?
DGRO is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFLV and DGRO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of DFLV and 92% of DGRO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFLV against DGRO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dflv-vs-dgro

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.