Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DDTO vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DDTO returned +12.0% to IVV's +14.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% to DDTO's 0.79%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DDTO and IVV
Net assets: $38m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Oct, and $872.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 0.76 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IVV is far larger, $886.8bn against $38m.
| Measure | DDTO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.0% | +14.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 0.5% | |
| Fund price fall to the buffer | 0.7% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | S&P 500 |
| The outcome period | ||
| Room to the cap | 14.1% | |
| Buffer left, in index points | 10.0% of 10.0% | |
| Days left in the period | 330 | |
| Period ends | Sep 30, 2027 | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% |
| Net assets | $38m | $886.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.3% | |
Risk and return
Oct 10, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 55 weekly returns · each against SPYFrom Oct 2025 to Oct 2026, IVV returned more: +17.1% to +12.6%. DDTO swung less: 5.9% to 12.0%. DDTO fell less at its worst: −4.5% to −8.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DDTO | IVV | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +12.6% | +17.1% | IVV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +11.9% | +16.1% | IVV | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +12.6% | +15.7% | IVV | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 5.9% | 12.0% | DDTO | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 3.2% | 7.0% | DDTO | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −4.5% | −8.4% | DDTO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 41.8% | 100.9% | 100.0% | IVV | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 44.1% | 100.6% | 100.0% | DDTO | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.46 | 1.01 | 1.00 | DDTO lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 1.30 | 0.98 | DDTO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 2.35 | 1.69 | DDTO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.165 | 0.117 | 0.117 | DDTO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 2.67 | 1.92 | DDTO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +2.2% a year | 0.0% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.11 | −0.05 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −1.8% to +6.2% | −0.9% to +0.9% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.61 | 0.18 | IVV | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 6.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 55 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
DDTO and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DDTO
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 330 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Are DDTO and IVV in the same category?
- DDTO is a buffer ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, DDTO or IVV?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DDTO returned +12.0% and IVV +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, DDTO or IVV?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.76 percentage points a year. That is about $76 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DDTO against IVV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ddto-vs-ivv
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DDTO against IVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ddto-vs-ivv
[DDTO against IVV (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ddto-vs-ivv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.