Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or USO?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and USO returned +112.2%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, COWZ or USO?

COWZ charges 0.49% a year and USO charges 0.45%, so USO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs USO: how they differ

COWZ is an equity index fund and USO a commodity fund, and over the year USO returned more, +112.2% against +23.4%.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and United States Oil Fund, LP.

COWZ and USO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	USO United States Oil Fund, LP
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Pacer	USCF
What it is	US Cash Cows 100	Oil
Total return, 1 year	+23.4%	+112.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.9 pts	+94.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.45%
Holdings	100	not filed

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USO in plain words

USO is a commodity fund tracking the Oil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +112.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 57.1% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or USO?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and USO returned +112.2%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or USO?: COWZ charges 0.49% a year and USO charges 0.45%, so USO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against USO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against USO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-uso Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources