Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs GARP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to GARP's +18.0%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and GARPNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $3.6bn for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF.
Pair scorecard
GARP costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points; COWZ is 5.4 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | GARP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +18.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.0%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $3.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 43.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 352 weekly returnsGARP returned more: +232.4% to +168.1%. COWZ swung slightly less: 21.4% to 22.3%. GARP fell less at its worst: −30.1% to −35.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | COWZ | GARP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +168.1% | +232.4% | GARP | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.7% | +19.4% | GARP | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +132.6% | +215.4% | GARP | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.4% | 22.3% | COWZ (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.0% | 14.9% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −35.2% | −30.1% | GARP | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.65 | 0.78 | GARP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.93 | 1.16 | GARP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.45 | 0.65 | GARP | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 352 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and GARP hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
8% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and GARP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ and GARP do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. COWZ follows Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index and GARP follows MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index.
- Holdings in common. 8% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COWZ returned +24.4% and GARP +18.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
GARP
GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or GARP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and GARP +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or GARP?
- GARP is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against GARP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-garp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against GARP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-garp
[COWZ against GARP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-garp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.