Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to FBCG's +9.5%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and FBCG
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
COWZ costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.9 points.
| Measure | COWZ | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +9.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 | $19.5bn | $7.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 57.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FBCG hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FBCG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and FBCG +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or FBCG?
- COWZ is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fbcg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against FBCG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fbcg
[COWZ against FBCG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fbcg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.