Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to FNDX's +23.9%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and FNDX
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.
| Measure | COWZ | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +23.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Fundamental U.S. Large Company |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 | $19.5bn | $27.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 21.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 512 weekly returnsFNDX returned slightly more: +265.7% to +251.9%. FNDX swung less: 17.1% to 19.6%. FNDX fell slightly less at its worst: −35.2% to −36.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | COWZ | FNDX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +251.9% | +265.7% | FNDX (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.6% | +14.1% | FNDX (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +188.5% | +199.7% | FNDX (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.6% | 17.1% | FNDX | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.8% | 12.2% | FNDX | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −36.3% | −35.2% | FNDX (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.62 | 0.71 | FNDX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.89 | 1.00 | FNDX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.40 | FNDX (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 512 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FNDX hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
15% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ and FNDX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. COWZ follows Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index and FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company.
- Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. COWZ holds 100 positions and FNDX holds 731.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FNDX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and FNDX +23.9%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or FNDX?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against FNDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fndx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against FNDX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fndx
[COWZ against FNDX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fndx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.