Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to NOBL's +15.5%; 14% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and NOBL
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points.
| Measure | FNDX | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +15.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 | $27.6bn | $11.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 18, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 679 weekly returnsFNDX returned more: +394.3% to +264.8%. NOBL swung slightly less: 15.4% to 16.0%. NOBL fell less at its worst: −31.7% to −35.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FNDX | NOBL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +394.3% | +264.8% | FNDX | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.0% | +10.4% | FNDX | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +280.7% | +179.1% | FNDX | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.0% | 15.4% | NOBL (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.3% | 10.8% | NOBL (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −35.2% | −31.7% | NOBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.72 | 0.59 | FNDX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.03 | 0.84 | FNDX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.37 | 0.33 | FNDX | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 679 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and NOBL hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
14% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and NOBL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
- Holdings in common. 14% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and NOBL +15.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or NOBL?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-nobl
[FNDX against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.