Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AGG vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to FNDX's +23.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AGG and FNDX
Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.
Pair scorecard
AGG costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.3 points.
| Measure | AGG | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +23.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Fundamental U.S. Large Company |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 | $139.4bn | $27.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and FNDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AGG and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or FNDX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and FNDX +23.9%.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or FNDX?
- AGG is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AGG against FNDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-fndx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AGG against FNDX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-fndx
[AGG against FNDX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-fndx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.