Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs FLKR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to FLKR's +79.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and FLKR
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLKR costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 55.3 points; COWZ is 11.6 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +79.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $19.7bn | $1.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FLKR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and FLKR +79.7%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or FLKR?
- FLKR is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against FLKR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-flkr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against FLKR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-flkr
[COWZ against FLKR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-flkr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.