Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to VT's +13.5%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and VT
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.9 points.
| Measure | COWZ | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +13.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $19.5bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
5% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vt
[COWZ against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.