Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWG vs FPX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWG returned +13.3% to FPX's +2.9%; 7% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWG and FPX
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.4bn for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF and $1.4bn for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF.
Pair scorecard
COWG costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; COWG is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | COWG | FPX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.3% | +2.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 15.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | IPOX -100 U.S. Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $2.4bn | $1.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 28.4% | 46.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWG and FPX hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
7% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWG and FPX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWG and FPX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. COWG follows Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index and FPX follows IPOX -100 U.S. Index.
- Holdings in common. 7% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COWG returned +13.3% and FPX +2.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
COWG tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 65% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%.
FPX
FPX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 15.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWG or FPX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWG returned +13.3% and FPX +2.9%.
- Which is cheaper, COWG or FPX?
- COWG is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWG against FPX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowg-vs-fpx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWG against FPX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowg-vs-fpx
[COWG against FPX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowg-vs-fpx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.