Which returned more over the last year, COMB or USCI?

In the year to Oct 14, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +41.6% and USCI +43.7%.

Which is cheaper, COMB or USCI?

COMB is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

COMB vs USCI: Differences, Returns & Fees

COMB is an actively managed commodity fund and USCI a commodity futures fund, and over the year USCI returned +43.7% against +41.6%. Net assets: $163m on Oct 13, 2026 for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $419m on Oct 14, 2026 for United States Commodity Index Fund ETV.

COMB costs 0.80 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; USCI is 2.6 times larger.

COMB vs USCI: Differences, Returns & Fees
	COMB	USCI
Expense ratio	0.25%	1.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 13, 2026	$163m	$422m
Total return, 1 year	+41.6%	+43.7%
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	Broad futures
Holdings in common	not published

+41.6%

COMB total return, 1 year

+43.7%

USCI total return, 1 year

0.25%

COMB expense ratio

1.05%

USCI expense ratio

On the same fields

COMB

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

USCI

United States Commodity Index Fund ETV

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer GraniteShares USCF

What it is Actively managed Holds broad futures

Total return, 1 year +41.6% +43.7%

Its benchmark over the same days +41.5% (BCI) not published

Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs BCI not available

Expense ratio 0.25% 1.05%

Holdings 0 not read by ETFIQ

Net assets, COMB as of Oct 13, 2026 and USCI as of Oct 14, 2026 $163m $419m

COMB and USCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 14, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About COMB

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 14, 2026 it returned +41.6% with distributions reinvested, against +41.5% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

About USCI

USCI holds broad futures. Over the year to Oct 14, 2026 it returned +43.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.05% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMB or USCI?: In the year to Oct 14, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +41.6% and USCI +43.7%.
Which is cheaper, COMB or USCI?: COMB is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COMB vs FAAR COMB vs PDBC COMB vs NBCM BCD vs COMB FAAR vs USCI BCD vs USCI GSG vs USCI COMT vs USCI

COMB on its own →USCI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗USCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗USCF website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COMB against USCI, data as of Oct 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comb-vs-usci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.