CLIP vs XHLF: Differences, Returns & Fees

CLIP's duration was 0.1 years on May 31, 2026 and XHLF's 0.5 on Jul 31, 2026; XHLF charges 0.03% to CLIP's 0.07%. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $1.9bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about CLIP and XHLF

Answers cite the figures on this page.

XHLF costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.

CLIP vs XHLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
CLIPXHLF
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Net assets, CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026 and XHLF as of Jul 31, 2026$2.3bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+3.5%
What it tracksSolactive 1-3 month US T-Bill IndexBloomberg US Treasury Six Month Target Duration Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.7%
CLIP total return, 1 year
+3.5%
XHLF total return, 1 year
0.07%
CLIP expense ratio
0.03%
XHLF expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-044D892A1B

CLIP and XHLF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. CLIP follows Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index and XHLF follows Bloomberg US Treasury Six Month Target Duration Index.
  2. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 CLIP returned +3.7% and XHLF +3.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.
  3. Cost (similar). CLIP charges 0.07% of assets a year and XHLF 0.03%, a gap of 0.04 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +3.5%
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.03%
Holdings 25 not counted
Net assets, CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026 and XHLF as of Jul 31, 2026 $2.3bn $1.9bn

CLIP and XHLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CLIP

CLIP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

About XHLF

XHLF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CLIP or XHLF?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLIP returned +3.7% and XHLF +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, CLIP or XHLF?
XHLF is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CLIP against XHLF, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-xhlf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.