Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CLIP vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CLIP returned +3.8% to MINT's +4.2%, and CLIP charges 0.07% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CLIP and MINT
Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
CLIP costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points.
| Measure | CLIP | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +4.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $2.3bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 30, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 173 weekly returnsMINT returned more: +18.3% to +16.0%. CLIP swung less: 0.2% to 0.3%. CLIP fell less at its worst: 0.0% to −0.1%.
Full scorecard
8 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CLIP | MINT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +16.0% | +18.3% | MINT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +4.6% | +5.2% | MINT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +0.1% | +0.9% | MINT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 0.2% | 0.3% | CLIP | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 0.1% | 0.2% | CLIP | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | 0.0% | −0.1% | CLIP | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.50 | 1.83 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.77 | 2.81 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 173 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
CLIP and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CLIP and MINT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CLIP follows Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index and MINT follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. CLIP holds 25 positions and MINT holds 977.
- Cost. CLIP charges 0.07% of assets a year and MINT 0.36%, a gap of 0.29 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CLIP
CLIP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CLIP or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLIP returned +3.8% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CLIP or MINT?
- CLIP is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CLIP against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CLIP against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-mint
[CLIP against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.