A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

CGMS vs SCHI: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jun 30, 2026 CGMS's duration was 4.7 years and SCHI's 6.0; SCHI charges 0.03% to CGMS's 0.39%. Net assets: $5.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF, and $11.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF.

SCHI costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; SCHI is 2.2 times larger.

CGMS vs SCHI: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGMSSCHI
Expense ratio0.39%0.03%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$5.2bn$11.6bn
Total return, 1 year+1.0%−1.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index
Holdings in common10%
Below its high4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+1.0%
CGMS total return, 1 year
−1.8%
SCHI total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGMS expense ratio
0.03%
SCHI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGMS and SCHI hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

10% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGMS SCHI
Oracle Corp, due Feb 4, 2036 0.37% 0.22%
Morgan Stanley, due Jan 30, 2037 0.17% 0.18%
Oracle Corp, due Sep 26, 2035 0.22% 0.17%
Bank of America Corp, due Feb 6, 2037 0.54% 0.17%
Meta Platforms Inc, due May 15, 2036 0.16% 0.27%
Meta Platforms Inc, due Nov 15, 2035 0.16% 0.29%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The, due Oct 21, 2036 0.37% 0.16%
JPMorgan Chase & Co, due Apr 23, 2037 0.15% 0.17%
AbbVie Inc, due Mar 15, 2034 0.24% 0.14%
JPMorgan Chase & Co, due Feb 5, 2037 0.18% 0.14%
Morgan Stanley, due Oct 22, 2036 0.16% 0.13%
JPMorgan Chase & Co, due Apr 22, 2036 0.13% 0.17%
Only in CGMS
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 3.12%
RD Michigan Property Owner I LLC, due Mar 30, 2045 0.61%
MPT Operating Partnership LP / MPT Finance Corp, due Feb 15, 2032 0.38%
Connect Finco SARL / Connect US Finco LLC, due Sep 15, 2029 0.38%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 30, 2030 0.38%
Freddie Mac Pool, due Apr 1, 2055 0.35%
Navient Corp, due Aug 1, 2033 0.34%
Mars Inc, due Mar 1, 2035 0.34%
Only in SCHI
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc, due Feb 1, 2036 0.24%
Bank of America Corp, due Jul 22, 2033 0.24%
Bank of America Corp, due Jan 23, 2035 0.23%
Bank of America Corp, due Apr 25, 2034 0.23%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd, due May 19, 2033 0.23%
JPMorgan Chase & Co, due Jun 1, 2034 0.21%
Salesforce Inc, due Mar 15, 2036 0.21%
JPMorgan Chase & Co, due Jul 25, 2033 0.20%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGMS
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Capital Group Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +1.0% −1.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not published −1.8% (VCIT)
Gap to its benchmark not available 0.0 pts vs VCIT
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.03%
Holdings 1465 2345
Net assets, CGMS as of Oct 8, 2026 and SCHI as of Jun 30, 2026 $5.4bn $11.6bn

CGMS and SCHI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGMS

CGMS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

About SCHI

SCHI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGMS or SCHI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGMS returned +1.0% and SCHI −1.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGMS or SCHI?
SCHI is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CGMS vs CORPCGMS vs VTCCGMS vs QLTACGMS vs USIGSCHI vs USIGSCHI vs UCONSCHI vs SPBOSCHI vs VTC
CGMS on its own →SCHI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CGMS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CGMS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Capital Group page for CGMS ↗SCHI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SCHI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Schwab website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGMS against SCHI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgms-vs-schi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.