Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to VYM's +18.0%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and VYM
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $78.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF.
Pair scorecard
VYM costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.4 points; VYM is 3.0 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +18.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE High Dividend Yield Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.1bn | $78.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 26.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VYM hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
9% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and VYM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and VYM follows FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and VYM +18.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 15.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VYM
VYM tracks an index of US high dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 595 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VYM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and VYM +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or VYM?
- VYM is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against VYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vym
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against VYM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vym
[CGGR against VYM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vym)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.