Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to VTV's +23.5%; 12% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and VTV
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $184.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
VTV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.9 points; VTV is 7.1 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +23.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar US Large Cap Value Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.1bn | $184.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 12% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 23.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VTV hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
12% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and VTV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and VTV follows Morningstar US Large Cap Value Index.
- Holdings in common. 12% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and VTV +23.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 20.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VTV
VTV tracks an index of US value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 300 positions, with the top ten at 23.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VTV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and VTV +23.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or VTV?
- VTV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against VTV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vtv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against VTV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vtv
[CGGR against VTV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vtv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.