Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs VTHR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to VTHR's +13.3%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and VTHR
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $4.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
VTHR costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.7 points; CGGR is 5.3 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | VTHR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +13.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell 3000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.1bn | $4.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 39% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 34.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VTHR hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
39% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and VTHR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and VTHR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and VTHR follows Russell 3000 Index.
- Holdings in common. 39% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and VTHR +13.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VTHR
VTHR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,986 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VTHR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and VTHR +13.3%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or VTHR?
- VTHR is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against VTHR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vthr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against VTHR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vthr
[CGGR against VTHR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vthr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.