Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs VO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to VO's +12.8%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and VO
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $103.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
VO costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.2 points; VO is 4.0 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | VO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +12.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.1bn | $103.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 9.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VO hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
10% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and VO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and VO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and VO follows Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index).
- Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and VO +12.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VO
VO tracks an index of Mid-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 273 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and VO +12.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or VO?
- VO is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against VO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against VO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vo
[CGGR against VO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.